The population of East Lindsey is 136,200 (2004), but the focus of this application is the district’s Coastal Action Zone1, which has a population of about 60,000. This more than doubles in the summer months and can reach 300,000. The district of East Lindsey covers 700 square miles and is the third largest district in the country.
The statistics relating to deprivation reveal serious socio-economic difficulties and are outlined at www.coastalactionzone.co.uk. People living on the Coast are older than the national average – 26% are over 65 against 16% nationally and their ethnicity is overwhelmingly (99%) white. Residents of working age have dramatically different socio-economic characteristics from the county, regional and English averages:
The map shows official indices of deprivation at super-output area level. The Coastal Action Zone appears in red (most deprived) and the inset map shows that this ‘most deprived’ status is shared with the obvious inner city areas but with few other rural areas other than Cornwall, which is designated an Objective 1 Area.
The very isolation and deprivation of the Coast presents a specific opportunity. The jobs created by the casino and other leisure facilities will, mainly, offer modest wages indicatively between 10% and 100% higher than the minimum wage, or some £10,000-£20,000 a year depending on the job. Moreover, many of the jobs would be year-round, lessening the problem of seasonality of employment which is one of the main difficulties facing residents seeking work. These conditions are attractive to residents but insufficient to induce significant in-commuting given the distances that commuters would need to travel. In short, most jobs would go to local people.
In keeping with the strict operating practices casinos invest heavily in training adding to the local skills base especially in customer care – a vital element in a service based economy such as ours.
A further effect associated with isolation is that ‘knock-on’ expenditures from for instance spending by casino and other employees will be concentrated within the Coast itself rather than – as in major urban areas – being dispersed throughout a large economy. As a result, our estimate of the forward employment multiplier is relatively high at 1.25, compared with a more normal figure of about 1.183.
A central element of our tourism strategy is the development of ‘year-round’ facilities, such as the casino, to lessen the seasonality of current tourism. The Coast attracts over six million visitors per annum and has numerous visitor attractions, the largest in terms of visitor numbers include:
Skegness Natureland Seal Sanctuary (143,000 visitors @ £4.95) is the East Midlands’ 5th largest paid attraction and Skegness Water Leisure Park (160,000 visitors) is the region’s 4th largest free attraction2. Although these attractions are wholly different in type from the proposed casino, they demonstrate the ability of the visitor base to generate visitor numbers of the same order of magnitude (about 90,000) as is planned for the casino in its first year of operation.
The table presents key data on tourism. The critical points are as follows:
It is important to emphasise the isolation of the Coastal Action Zone from areas of economic success. Skegness is an hour by car from Lincoln and is two hours from major centres of prosperity such as Peterborough and Nottingham. The Coast lacks an FE college and travel-to-learn times from Skegness to colleges in Grimsby, Boston and Lincoln average an hour one way by car. All travel times are greatly increased if public transport is used. This degree of isolation make it impractical for people without reliable cars to access employment and learning opportunities away from the Coast, and makes the effects of deprivation worse than in the inner cities which – whatever their problems – are at least adjacent to many opportunities.
Map 2 shows the location of the Coastal Action Zone and specifically of its two main settlements, Skegness and Mablethorpe. Visitors from much of England have good access to the M180 and to the near-motorway A1, but from these major routes to the Coast road travellers face long journeys.
Central Trains provides a rail link from Skegness to the East Coast Mainline station at Grantham via Boston and Sleaford, but this link transports only a small proportion of total visitor numbers. Similarly, the local bus services accommodate only small numbers of visitors: the predominant mode of transport is the private car.
The market for the resorts of the Coastal Action Zone has been for decades the industrial areas of South Yorkshire and the East Midlands, areas already served by casinos, with the local, Lincolnshire market in a secondary role. This remains the position today, though visitor numbers from farther afield and even from abroad are already significant and growing in importance – and our tourism strategy, of which this casino proposal is a central part, aims to reinforce these trends.
| Key tourism data for the Coastal Action Zone | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Visitors | Day | Overnight | Total |
| Visitor days, m | 4.95 | 4.76 | 9.71 |
| Visitor numbers, m | 4.95 | 1.13 | 6.08 |
| Accommodation | Units | Bedspaces | |
| Static caravans | 11328 | 133984 | |
| Pitches for touring caravans & tents | 4525 | 9050 | |
| Hotels etc. | N/A | 5207 | |
| Self catering | 898 | 2694 | |
| Holiday resort (Butlins) | 1600 | 7000 | |
| Total | 57935 | ||
| Expenditure, £m 2003 | Spend per visitor | Spend per visitor day | |
| Day visitors | 131.4 | £26.54 | £26.54 |
| Overnight visitors | 170.0 | £150.44 | £35.71 |
| Total | 301.4 | ||
| Catering | 103.0 | ||
| Retail | 68.3 | ||
| Accommodation | 47.1 | ||
| Travel | 44.0 | ||
| Attractions & Entertainment | 39.0 | ||
| Total | 301.4 | ||
1. Extensive information about the Coastal Action Zone is available from www.coastalactionzone.co.uk
2. www.staruk.co.uk has extensive statistics
3. Professor Glyn Owen – Economic Case for a Small Casino within the Coastal Action Zone